Skip to main content
Researcher Center
SupportGet Early Access
Menu

Walkthrough

See the cited-answer workflow

The product should be judged by its behavior: whether answers are grounded in lab evidence, whether sources open cleanly, and whether unsupported questions are refused.

Get Early AccessReview Security

What to look for

  1. Ask a question in the language your lab already uses.
  2. Receive an answer grounded in the workspace's own documents.
  3. Open the citation and inspect the source evidence.
  4. See a clear refusal when the available corpus cannot support the question.

Refusal behavior

Question: What protocol did we use for the 2022 animal study?

Response: I could not find the protocol in the available sources. I found references to the study, but not enough evidence to identify the procedure. Add the protocol document or ask about the notes currently available.

Cited answer experience

Cited answer experienceVideo walkthrough

The core workflow: ask a lab document question, read the answer, open the evidence.

Text description of this walkthrough
  1. The workspace chat opens on a lab workspace holding that lab's own protocol documents.
  2. A researcher types the question “What temperature and time should the autoclave run at?” and selects Ask.
  3. The answer comes back grounded in the workspace corpus: the autoclave must run at 121 degrees Celsius for 20 minutes for complete sterilization, with a numbered citation marker attached to the claim.
  4. Selecting that citation opens the cited source, autoclave-protocol.md, and reveals the exact supporting passage the sentence was drawn from.

Onboarding onto a project

Onboarding onto a projectVideo walkthrough

A new member follows a guided path through readings, safety, and project context.

Text description of this walkthrough
  1. A new lab member opens the onboarding page for their workspace.
  2. Their curated path, “New student ramp”, opens with its steps already in order.
  3. Step one is a required reading: read the autoclave protocol end to end, linked to the project document that later answers cite back to.
  4. Step two is a required safety item: complete the biosafety induction, linked to the reagent-safety document.
  5. Step three is an optional meeting: meet your PI and lab manager.

Structured literature review

Structured literature reviewVideo walkthrough

Workspace papers can be compared without losing method, finding, or evidence state.

Text description of this walkthrough
  1. A researcher opens the literature view for the workspace.
  2. A saved comparison, “Sterilization methods”, opens as a table with one row per paper.
  3. The first row covers moist-heat sterilization at 121 degrees Celsius: the method column reads 121 degrees Celsius for 20 minutes and the finding is complete sterilization of labware.
  4. That row is marked as validated, because it is backed by evidence passages in the workspace corpus.
  5. The second row covers dry-heat sterilization at 160 degrees Celsius for two hours, a longer cycle suited to moisture-sensitive materials; it carries no evidence passages, so it is not marked validated.

Behind the answers

A lab-admin workflow handles document upload, scan, ingestion, embeddings, provider choice, and usage controls before researchers ask questions.

See the lab-admin demoCompare AI options