Use case
Check research claims against the original source
Before a claim reaches a manuscript, grant, or meeting, trace it back to the lab document that supports it.
Who it is for
Researchers who need to verify internal claims, methods, and prior conclusions before relying on them.
Why this matters
Research claims travel quickly through drafts and meetings. Without the original source, teams risk repeating a claim that is incomplete, outdated, or condition-specific.
What it helps with
Trace claims to original evidence before reuse.
Distinguish supported conclusions from condition-specific observations.
Find missing evidence before a claim enters a manuscript or grant.
How a pilot would use it
- Upload draft-relevant papers, reports, theses, protocols, and notes.
- Ask whether a claim is supported and which source says so.
- Open the source passage and decide whether the claim needs qualification.
Example question
Can we say lower build speed always increased yield strength?
No. The uploaded evidence supports that observation only in the tested low-heat-input condition. The process review reports inconsistent behavior under high heat input.
Trust and controls
- Answers cite source evidence rather than relying on model confidence.
- Unsupported questions should receive a refusal or a narrower answer.
- The workflow supports careful review; it does not replace scientific judgment.
Current Early Access limits and provider-mode disclosures are documented on the known limitations page.
Start with a focused lab corpus
The strongest pilot starts with documents your lab already trusts: protocols, core papers, theses, project notes, and recurring questions.