Use case
Source-grounded answers for engineering research groups
Ask simulation notes, test reports, design records, and technical memos with answers tied to the exact source.
Who it is for
Engineering research groups in mechanics, materials, manufacturing, simulation, and applied R&D.
Why this matters
Technical assumptions and experimental context often sit across reports, code, plots, and old notes that are hard to reconnect later.
What it helps with
Find parameters, test conditions, and prior decisions faster.
Compare cited evidence across reports and notes before acting.
Keep technical assumptions traceable across projects.
How a pilot would use it
- Group project documents into workspaces your team can search.
- Ask methods, parameter, and project-history questions in plain language.
- Open the cited source before using an answer in design or analysis work.
Example question
Which mesh size did we use in the final validation model?
The final validation model used a 0.5 mm local mesh in the notch region and a 2 mm global mesh elsewhere, after the convergence note showed less than 3% change in peak stress.
Trust and controls
- Every claim links back to retrieved source evidence.
- Search and answers stay scoped to authorized workspaces.
- Run AI locally or with your own key when the work is sensitive.
Current Early Access limits and provider-mode disclosures are documented on the known limitations page.
Start with a focused lab corpus
The strongest pilot starts with documents your lab already trusts: protocols, core papers, theses, project notes, and recurring questions.